‘Total contradiction’: Tobacco giant lobbied against rules in Africa which are law in UK

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, BAT suggests this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

In the letter, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The company was “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that underage people should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned population health targets, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of black market activity”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.

Michael Marshall
Michael Marshall

Elara is a seasoned gaming analyst with a passion for uncovering the best online casino deals and strategies.